If you're leading a health care organization in Canada right now, you're feeling the squeeze. On one side, your teams are pushing hard to maintain and improve quality standards. On the other, you're facing relentless pressure to increase access and reduce wait times. It can feel like being caught between a rock and a hard place, especially when your resources aren't growing as fast as demands.
As someone who works closely with health care leaders across Canada, I've sat in countless offices where talented, dedicated leaders share their struggles with this seemingly impossible balance.
The tension is real whether you are leading an organization directly providing services, preparing future professionals to provide those services, or a regulator seeking to protect the public while receiving care.
However, this apparent trade-off between quality and access might be more perception than reality. Let me explain why, and more importantly, show you how some forward-thinking Canadian health care organizations are proving it's possible to excel at both.
At our Reimagining Health Care Leadership event, we asked attendees a provocative question: "Can we increase quality while simultaneously increasing access?" The results surprised me - 85.3% either agreed or strongly agreed that it was indeed possible.
Though the confidence of those gathered was heartening, it didn’t match up with what I frequently heard from clients. So, why the disconnect?
The answer may lie in how we've been conditioned to think about health care delivery.
Consider these common mental traps:
The quality-access tension didn't emerge from nowhere. Our current challenges stem from trying to meet 21st-century needs with 20th-century systems. Think about it:
Our health care system was brilliantly designed - for a different era. We have many organizations built for acute care in a world dominated by chronic care needs. It's like trying to run modern software on vintage hardware; at some point, the mismatch becomes apparent.
While historically effective, the siloed nature of many aspects of our health care system creates inefficiencies that impact both quality and access. When resources feel scarce (and when don't they?), it's natural to fall into either-or thinking. But this mindset itself might be our biggest barrier to progress.
Evidence is mounting that organizations taking a transformative approach are achieving what once seemed impossible: simultaneous improvements in both quality and access. This isn't about working harder; it's about working differently.
Successful organizations focus on four key areas:
You might be thinking, "This sounds great, but where do I start?"
Here's a practical roadmap:
To make this transformation work, leaders need to:
Improving both quality and access isn't just possible; it's happening in organizations across Canada. The key lies not in choosing between these priorities, but in transforming how we approach them both.
The quality-access paradox isn't a law of nature - it's a limitation of our current thinking and systems, and it can be overcome.
We don't email often.
When we do, we contribute value.
If you don't see the value, we make it easy to unsubscribe.
50% Complete